STEM Tube Learner & Teacher Excellence Model
Performance-Based Monitoring & Evaluation Index · 9 Strategic Components · 45 Integrated Metrics
Total Metrics
45
On Track
0
At Risk / Warning
0
Avg Target Attainment
0%
| # | COMPONENT & METRIC | M&E LEVEL | PILLAR | FREQUENCY | TARGET | ACTUAL | PROGRESS | STATUS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I. Learner Excellence & STEM Gateway STEM Learner Enrollment Rate Percentage of total applicants who enroll specifically in STEM TUBE's STEM track/subjects. | Outputs | Reach | Quarterly | 80% | — | — | — |
| 2 | I. Learner Excellence & STEM Gateway STEM Course Completion Rate Percentage of enrolled STEM learners who successfully complete the entire program/course. | Outcomes | Teach/Quality | Quarterly | 90% | — | — | — |
| 3 | I. Learner Excellence & STEM Gateway Average STEM Assessment Score Mean score of all learners across end-of-module/program STEM assessments. | Outcomes | Teach/Quality | Quarterly | 75% | — | — | — |
| 4 | I. Learner Excellence & STEM Gateway STEM Subject Retention Rate Percentage of learners who choose to continue with key STEM subjects (e.g., Gr. 4 to Gr. 12). | Outcomes | Reach | Yearly | 95% | — | — | — |
| 5 | I. Learner Excellence & STEM Gateway STEM Subject Choice Index Percentage of STEM TUBE learners who ultimately select STEM subjects for their tertiary education/career. | Impact | Scale/Impact | Yearly | 60% | — | — | — |
| 6 | I. Learner Excellence & STEM Gateway STEM Post-Matric Success Rate Percentage of STEM TUBE alumni enrolled in STEM-related tertiary programs (e.g., Engineering, Medicine). | Impact | Scale/Impact | Yearly | 70% | — | — | — |
| 7 | I. Learner Excellence & STEM Gateway LMS STEM Engagement Average engagement score on online learning platforms (time spent, problems completed). | Outputs | Innovate | Weekly | 80% | — | — | — |
| 8 | I. Learner Excellence & STEM Gateway Learner Satisfaction Index Aggregate satisfaction score from learner surveys regarding the quality of the STEM instruction. | Outcomes | Reach | Monthly | 85% | — | — | — |
| 9 | II. Teacher Excellence & Quality STEM Support Teacher Training Completion Rate Percentage of teachers who successfully complete all required STEM-specific professional development. | Outputs | Teach/Quality | Quarterly | 100% | — | — | — |
| 10 | II. Teacher Excellence & Quality STEM Support Average Teacher Training Assessment Score Mean score of teachers across post-training assessments. | Outcomes | Teach/Quality | Quarterly | 85% | — | — | — |
| 11 | II. Teacher Excellence & Quality STEM Support Observed Quality of STEM Instruction Score Average score from classroom observations assessing STEM lesson delivery. | Outcomes | Teach/Quality | Bi-Annual | 4 | — | — | — |
| 12 | II. Teacher Excellence & Quality STEM Support Instructor Satisfaction Rate Percentage of instructors rating job satisfaction positively (support and resources). | Outcomes | Teach/Quality | Yearly | 90% | — | — | — |
| 13 | II. Teacher Excellence & Quality STEM Support Curriculum Alignment Frequency (STEM) Number of times the STEM curriculum is reviewed and updated for alignment. | Outputs | Teach/Quality | Yearly | 1 | — | — | — |
| 14 | II. Teacher Excellence & Quality STEM Support Teacher-to-Learner Ratio (STEM Specific) Number of STEM teachers relative to the number of STEM learners. | Inputs | Teach/Quality | Yearly | 25 | — | — | — |
| 15 | III. SMT (School Management Team) Component SMT Training Application Rate Percentage of SMT training topics/skills observed and documented as implemented in school management. | Outputs | Scale/Impact | Quarterly | 80% | — | — | — |
| 16 | III. SMT (School Management Team) Component SMT Self-Efficacy Score Average score measuring SMT confidence/competence in key functional areas. | Outcomes | Scale/Impact | Bi-Annual | 4.2 | — | — | — |
| 17 | III. SMT (School Management Team) Component Teacher Support & Supervision Index Teacher feedback on the frequency, quality, and constructiveness of SMT-led supervision. | Outcomes | Scale/Impact | Yearly | 90% | — | — | — |
| 18 | III. SMT (School Management Team) Component School-Wide KPI Achievement Rate Percentage of the school's overall performance targets achieved during the STEM TUBE support. | Impact | Scale/Impact | Quarterly | 75% | — | — | — |
| 19 | IV. Career Exposure Component Career Exposure Participation Rate Percentage of learners participating in at least three career exposure activities. | Outputs | Scale/Impact | Quarterly | 95% | — | — | — |
| 20 | IV. Career Exposure Component Learner Career Pathway Clarity Percentage increase in learners who can correctly identify a relevant post-school pathway (Pre/Post Survey). | Outcomes | Scale/Impact | Yearly | 25% | — | — | — |
| 21 | IV. Career Exposure Component Industry Partner Engagement Hours Total hours industry professionals commit to direct engagement with STEM TUBE learners. | Outputs | Scale/Impact | Quarterly | 500 | — | — | — |
| 22 | IV. Career Exposure Component Learner Self-Efficacy in STEM Careers Average score measuring learners' belief in their capability to succeed in a STEM career field. | Outcomes | Scale/Impact | Yearly | 4 | — | — | — |
| 23 | V. Subject Improvement (Academic Outcomes) Mean Grade Improvement Score (Mathematics) Avg. % point increase in year-end mark vs. previous year. | Outcomes | Teach/Quality | Yearly | 10 | — | — | — |
| 24 | V. Subject Improvement (Academic Outcomes) Mean Grade Improvement Score (Natural Sciences) Avg. % point increase in year-end mark vs. previous year. | Outcomes | Teach/Quality | Yearly | 8 | — | — | — |
| 25 | V. Subject Improvement (Academic Outcomes) Mean Grade Improvement Score (English) Avg. % point increase in year-end mark vs. previous year. | Outcomes | Teach/Quality | Yearly | 7 | — | — | — |
| 26 | V. Subject Improvement (Academic Outcomes) Mean Grade Improvement Score (Accounting) Avg. % point increase in year-end mark vs. previous year. | Outcomes | Teach/Quality | Yearly | 8 | — | — | — |
| 27 | V. Subject Improvement (Academic Outcomes) Subject Failure Rate Reduction Percentage reduction in the number of learners achieving a failing grade (Core Subjects). | Outcomes | Teach/Quality | Yearly | 50% | — | — | — |
| 33 | V. Subject Improvement (Academic Outcomes) Distinction Rate Increase Percentage increase in learners achieving a distinction (80%+) in key STEM subjects. | Impact | Teach/Quality | Yearly | 20% | — | — | — |
| 28 | VI. Retention and Dropout Prevention STEM TUBE Program Dropout Rate Percentage of enrolled learners who leave the STEM TUBE program before the completion date. | Impact | Reach | Quarterly | 5% | — | — | — |
| 29 | VI. Retention and Dropout Prevention Early Warning System (EWS) Flag Rate Percentage of learners identified as 'at-risk' (low attendance, low scores) by the EWS. | Outputs | Reach | Monthly | 15% | — | — | — |
| 30 | VI. Retention and Dropout Prevention At-Risk Intervention Success Rate Percentage of EWS-flagged learners who remain in the program and show measurable improvement after intervention. | Outcomes | Reach | Quarterly | 70% | — | — | — |
| 31 | VI. Retention and Dropout Prevention Attendance Rate (Overall/STEM Specific) Average percentage of scheduled STEM TUBE sessions that enrolled learners attend. | Outputs | Reach | Monthly | 90% | — | — | — |
| 32 | VI. Retention and Dropout Prevention Learner Retention Rate (Year-on-Year) Percentage of eligible learners who re-enroll in the next cycle/grade level. | Impact | Reach | Yearly | 92% | — | — | — |
| 34 | VII. Financial & Operational Sustainability Cost per Learner (CPL) Total programme expenditure divided by the average number of active learners served. | Inputs | Scale/Impact | Quarterly | 5000 | — | — | — |
| 35 | VII. Financial & Operational Sustainability Funding Diversity Index Ratio of operational funding derived from non-single-source revenue (e.g., grants, small donations). | Inputs | Scale/Impact | Yearly | 0.6 | — | — | — |
| 36 | VII. Financial & Operational Sustainability Resource Utilization Rate Percentage of allocated resources (e.g., equipment, budget) that are actively used by the programme. | Inputs | Scale/Impact | Quarterly | 90% | — | — | — |
| 37 | VII. Financial & Operational Sustainability Programme Scalability Score Assessment score on documented procedures and ease of replicating the model in a new site. | Impact | Scale/Impact | Yearly | 4.5 | — | — | — |
| 38 | VIII. Coding & Robotics Programme Robotics/Coding Project Completion Rate Percentage of enrolled learners who successfully complete the final required C&R project. | Outputs | Teach/Quality | Quarterly | 85% | — | — | — |
| 39 | VIII. Coding & Robotics Programme Learner Portfolio Quality Score Average evaluation score given to learners' digital portfolios of coding projects/robotics designs. | Outcomes | Teach/Quality | Bi-Annual | 7 | — | — | — |
| 40 | VIII. Coding & Robotics Programme Learner Competition Participation Rate Percentage of C&R learners who enter and participate in external coding or robotics competitions. | Outputs | Reach | Yearly | 25% | — | — | — |
| 41 | VIII. Coding & Robotics Programme Certification Achievement Rate Percentage of C&R learners who achieve a recognized external technology certification. | Outcomes | Teach/Quality | Yearly | 30% | — | — | — |
| 42 | IX. Marketing & Public Relations (PR) Media Reach & Share of Voice Number of unique media mentions (online, print, broadcast). | Outputs | Innovate | Quarterly | 50 | — | — | — |
| 43 | IX. Marketing & Public Relations (PR) Partner/Donor Lead Generation Rate Number of qualified new potential partners or donors generated through PR and marketing efforts. | Outputs | Innovate | Quarterly | 15 | — | — | — |
| 44 | IX. Marketing & Public Relations (PR) Online Engagement Rate Average likes, shares, and comments across key social media platforms. | Outputs | Innovate | Monthly | 5% | — | — | — |
| 45 | IX. Marketing & Public Relations (PR) Brand Sentiment Score Score derived from text analysis of media and social mentions (positive/negative perception). | Outcomes | Innovate | Quarterly | 80% | — | — | — |